MLPs
Now that you understand the concept of
return of capital, let’s examine Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs). An MLP is
a company that has a special structure that bypasses corporate taxes because it
passes along (nearly) all of its profits to its shareholders in the form of a
distribution.
These distributions are treated as
return of capital by the Internal Revenue Service so investing in MLPs can be a
tax-deferred strategy for generating income. As we discussed in the section on
closed-end funds, the return of capital lowers your cost basis.
I’m simplifying things with this
example, but if you bought an MLP at $25 per share and for ten years received a
$1 per share distribution that was all return of capital, your cost basis would
be reduced to $15.
Over those ten years, you would not pay
taxes on those $10 in distributions ($1 X 10 years). However, when you go to
sell, you will pay a capital gain tax on the difference between $15 and the
selling price.
Talk to your tax professional before
investing in MLPs, because the tax implications can be complex. Additionally,
you receive a K-1 tax form from the company, which is different than the
1099-DIV that you get from regular dividend-paying companies. This can add to
the cost and timeliness of your tax preparation.
About 80% of MLPs are energy companies.
Most of them are oil and gas pipelines that aren’t impacted much by the price
of oil or gas. Their business relies on volume of product that flows through
its pipelines.
Other MLPs include infrastructure
companies, financial firms, and even a cemetery operator.
MLPs are popular with income investors
due to their strong tax-deferred dividends. The risk is that since all of the
company’s profits are distributed back to shareholders, any decrease in
earnings can result in a dividend cut. Although the dividend is high, it is
usually not as stable as a strong dividend player like Clorox, which pays out
only 54% of its profits in dividends and has raised its dividend for 34
consecutive years.
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (NYSE:
KMP) and Enterprise Product Partners (NYSE: EPD) are examples of two popular
MLPs.
REITs
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
are also very popular with income investors. A REIT is a company that has a
collection of real estate, usually rental properties. Like an MLP, a REIT does
not pay corporate taxes and instead must distribute the profits back to
shareholders. So REITs often have fairly high yields.
There are REITs for nearly everything:
REITs that specialize in apartment buildings, office buildings, shopping
centers, hospitals, medical offices, nursing homes, data storage centers ...
REITs do not have the same tax
implications as MLPs. In an MLP, you are considered a partner in the business.
In a REIT, you are a unitholder. The dividends you receive from a REIT will
usually be taxed as ordinary income, not at the dividend tax rate, although a
portion of the income you receive may be considered return of capital, which
would be tax deferred and would lower your cost basis, similar to an MLP.
(However, it’s usually a much smaller percentage than with an MLP.)
Again—and I can’t stress this
enough—talk to your tax professional about any questions you may have.
REITs can be volatile, just like the
real estate market. If real estate values fall, so do the NAVs of the
properties owned by the REIT. Additionally, a weak economy can lead to a
greater number of vacancies, reducing profits and, as a result, the dividend.
The opposite is true. During the real
estate bubble, the MSCI US REIT index rose 43% between January 2005 and January
2007 (of course, many houses appreciated considerably more), but it plummeted
78% over the next two years as real estate prices collapsed.
Examples of REITs include Healthcare
REIT (NYSE: HCN), which owns housing facilities for seniors and other health
care related properties, and Equity Residential (NYSE: EQR), which is the
country’s largest apartment manager.
BDCs
A Business Development Company (BDC) is
a publicly traded private equity investment firm. Usually you need boatloads of
money or connections to get into a private equity investment.
Private equity firms create funds and
usually invest in early-stage start-up companies. They can be anything from a
biotech company with a new technology for treating cancer to a chain of coffee
houses. Some private equity companies specialize in certain sectors, such as
biotech, technology, or retail; others are generalists, entertaining opportunities
wherever they lie.
Why would someone invest in a private
equity fund? We all know how wealthy you could have become if you had invested
in Microsoft and Apple when the companies had their initial public offerings
(IPOs). Imagine how rich you would have been if you had invested even before
they went public.
When early-stage companies are private
and raising money, they can still sell shares, just not to the public in the
markets. They sell them in privately arranged transactions. These transactions
may be facilitated by pretty much anyone—an investment bank, a board member, or
the CEO’s mom.
These kinds of deals are usually done
by knowing the right people. When looking for funding for Marc Lichtenfeld’s
Authentic Italian Trattoria, I may have reached out to some well-heeled
investors whom I know have funds dedicated to this type of speculation, or my
mom may have mentioned it to her mahjong group and one of her friends decided
to invest $100,000 with me.
When you invest in an early-stage
company, you typically get a larger portion of equity than if you bought shares
once the company’s stock is publicly traded. When Microsoft went public in
1986, investors who bought $100,000 worth of stock at the IPO owned 0.15% of
the company. Perhaps if someone invested $100,000 in 1977, when the company was
still in its early stages, he might have received 2% of the company for that
$100,000 (I’m making these 1977 numbers up just to illustrate the point).
Young companies have to sell larger
portions of themselves early on in order to attract investment dollars. Those
equity positions can become very lucrative as a company matures and
particularly if it goes public.
Sometimes these private equity firms
lend money to the start-up instead of taking an equity position. For
early-stage companies with little revenue, getting a business loan can be
difficult, particularly now that money is tight; for this reason, the start-ups
may have to go to other sources.
A private equity firm may lend money to
a start-up at, let’s say, 13% annual interest, even though the standard bank
business loan might be 8%. Since the start-up can’t get a bank loan, it has to
pony up the higher interest rate since the risk is larger.
Each loan is structured differently,
but it is common for the lender to take an equity position or take possession
of collateral, such as intellectual property, product, or equipment, if the
loan is not paid back.
You
Don’t Have to Play Mahjong with Mrs. Zuckerberg
Many investors would love the
opportunity to get in on the early stages of exciting new companies. But unless
you play mahjong with the mother of the next Mark Zuckerberg (Founder and CEO
of Facebook), or you’re otherwise well connected, learning about these
opportunities can be difficult.
BDCs allow the everyday investor to get
involved with a portfolio of companies, spreading out the risk and very often
paying a nice income stream.
For example, Main Street Capital
Corporation (Nasdaq: MAIN) is a $500 million market cap BDC that, as of
December 2011, paid a yield of about 8.2%.
It makes both equity and debt
investments and has a wide variety of companies in its portfolio, including:
- Hydratec Holdings, LLC, a Delano, California, manufacturer
of micro-irrigation systems for farmers
- River Aggregates, LLC, a Porter, Texas, sand and gravel
supplier
- Ziegler’s New York Pizza Department, a Phoenix, Arizona,
pizza chain
Many BDCs pay a robust yield, but as
with any investment, there is no such thing as a free lunch. (Unless you’re an
investor in Main Street; maybe Ziegler’s hooks you up with a free slice of
pizza. I don’t know, but it’s worth a shot.) The higher the yield (or potential
reward), the higher the risk. So if you’re considering investing in a BDC with
a high yield, do your homework on the company, see how consistent the dividend
has been, and try to ascertain whether it will be sustainable.
Doing that might not be as easy as with
your typical dividend-paying company, where you can look and see how many
widgets it sells and what its profit margins and cash flow are. However, if a
BDC has a long and consistent track record, you should have a bit more
confidence that it can continue paying the dividend.
As with a REIT, the Internal Revenue
Service treats a BDC’s dividend differently. In order to pay no corporate income
tax, a BDC must pass through at least 90% of its profits on to shareholders.
Most pass on an even higher percentage of the profits.
Generally, you’ll be taxed on the kind
of income the BDC received. If it earns interest on a loan, you probably will
be taxed on that portion as ordinary income. If it sells a company for a
capital gain, you will be taxed on that portion at the capital gain rate.
The BDC will send you a form with the
breakdown so you’ll have all the information you’ll need.
Once again, if you have any tax-related
questions, repeat this with me now: Talk to your tax professional.
Closed-end funds, MLPs, REITs, and BDCs
can be an excellent way to add yield to your income portfolio. Many of these
businesses generate a ton of cash and must pass that cash along to
shareholders, which is why they are able to pay investors more than other
companies.
When Exxon Mobil makes a profit,
management decides what do to with that cash. Does it invest in new equipment,
put a gym in the corporate headquarters, or give some back to shareholders?
MLPs, REITs, and BDCs, by the laws of their corporate structure, must return
profits to shareholders.
Keep in mind that such investments can
be volatile as they are usually concentrated in one (often cyclical) sector and
have more complex tax ramifications for shareholders. But if you don’t mind
doing a little homework and talking to your tax professional (or handling it
yourself with tax software), these investments can be an excellent way to boost
the amount of income you receive every year.
Preferred
Stocks
Preferred stocks are sort of a
combination of a bond and a stock. They pay a higher dividend, sometimes can be
converted into common stock, and are higher in the pecking order than common
stock if the company is liquidated. However, they come after bonds in that
situation.
If a company declares bankruptcy and
its assets are sold off, bondholders will be paid first. Next come preferred
shareholders, then shareholders of common stock.
Many preferred shares, known as
cumulative preferred stock, will accumulate the dividend if it is not paid.
When a dividend of a common stock is not paid or is cut, the shareholder is out
of luck. If, sometime in the future, the company re-establishes a dividend, the
shareholder starts from whatever dividend the company declared.
Cumulative preferred shareholders,
however, see their dividends accumulate during the period that the company did
not pay dividends. So if a company has an annual preferred dividend of $1 per
share, stops paying a dividend for two years, and later introduces a $1
preferred dividend in year 3, the preferred shareholders will have to get paid
out $3 per share ($1 plus the $2 missed) before any common shareholders can
receive a dividend.
As a result of this greater stability,
preferred shares are not as volatile as common stock. Preferred share investors
typically will not see the swings in share price that investors will see with
common shares—although during the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, numerous
preferred shares of financial stocks were decimated because of fears that the
companies might collapse. However, many of them came roaring back in 2009 and
2010.
Like a bond, a preferred is issued at
par value, and the dividend is usually fixed. The dividend is not going to grow
like a Perpetual Dividend Raiser. But for some investors, particularly those
who need the income now, the higher rate today may be worth sacrificing growth
tomorrow.
Also, like a bond, the dividend is
rated by credit rating agencies. And unlike a stock, preferred shareholders
have no voting rights. They are not owners of the company; they are creditors.
Financial institutions make up about
85% of all preferreds, so if the financial sector is strong, preferreds should
do well. If financials are weak, as they were during the 2008 crisis,
preferreds will be hit hard.
For example, insurer MetLife has the
MetLife Preferred B Shares (NYSE: METPrB) that pays a fixed rate of 6.5%
annually (on the par value, which is $25), with dividends paid quarterly. As I
write this, it is trading at $25.56, slightly above par value, so the yield is
6.4%. If you can buy a stock below par, you can get a yield higher than the
declared yield, just like a bond.
Par value: The face value (price at which it was first offered) of a
bond or preferred stock.
Preferred stocks are often redeemable
30 years after they are issued, although some have no redemption date. Of
course, you can always sell the stocks in the open market, although they are
generally not as liquid as common stock.
I’m not a huge fan of preferreds
because they are much closer to bonds than to stocks and typically don’t grow
dividends. A 6.5% yield might be attractive today, but it won’t keep up with
inflation, even a low level of inflation such as 3%.
Think about it this way. If you invest
$1,000 in a preferred with a 6.5% yield, you’ll receive $65 per year. However,
in three years at 3% inflation, you’ll need $1,092 to have the same buying
power as $1,000 three years prior. Your $65 per year won’t keep up with
inflation. You need a dividend growing faster than inflation to do that.
The benefit of a preferred stock is
that the dividend is higher than a stock, particularly for a blue chip company.
The downside is that it probably will not keep pace with inflation. Also, most
preferreds do not let you reinvest the dividends in more preferred shares.
However, some do let you reinvest the preferred dividends into common stock.
Like some of the other higher-yielding,
less traditional income investments, there’s nothing wrong with sprinkling one
or two preferreds into a portfolio. But since preferreds are a kind of
quasi-bond, you want the majority of your holdings to be Perpetual Dividend
Raisers.
SUMMARY
- Closed-end
funds are mutual funds that trade like stocks.
- Return
of capital is a cash distribution that is tax deferred and lowers your cost
basis.
- REITs
invest in real estate assets.
- MLPs
are partnerships, often energy pipelines.
- BDCs
are similar to publicly traded private equity firms.
- Preferred
stocks are as much like bonds as they are like stocks.
- Closed-end
funds, REITs, MLPs, BDCs and preferred stock are alternatives to regular
dividend payers in that they usually have higher-than-average yields—but they
can have complex tax implications as well.
- Playing
mahjong with Mrs. Zuckerberg might be a great way to get lucrative investing
ideas.