WHAT IS A PERPETUAL DIVIDEND RAISER?
When I first got into the financial
industry, I was an assistant on a trading desk, eventually working my way up to
trader. Before I knew how to analyze a company
by reading balance sheets and income statements, I learned about stock charts. Two key concepts in reading stock
charts are:
- The trend is your friend.
- A trend in motion stays in motion.
Essentially, what these two concepts
mean is that a stock will continue moving in the same direction until it
doesn’t any more. How’s that for insight?
But when you look at a chart of a stock
that is heading higher, although there are some minor corrections, it often
moves on a diagonal line (called a trend line) upward. Stocks traveling along
one of these trend lines usually continue until something changes their
direction. The cause of the change of direction could be a bad earnings report,
weak economic data, or a large institution selling its shares. Frequently, once
the trend is broken, the stock will reverse.
Investors who trade using chart data
look for opportunities to buy shares of stocks that are trending higher. I
bring this up because the same can be said about companies that raise their
dividends.
Typically, a company with an
established trend of increasing their dividends will raise them again next year
and the year after that and the year after that . . . unless it becomes
impossible to do so. Management knows that investors have come to expect the
dividend boost every year and any change in that policy will send them running
for the exits.
I call these companies Perpetual
Dividend Raisers, and they come in more than one variety.
Dividend
Aristocrats
The concept of a Dividend Aristocrat is
simple. A Dividend Aristocrat is a company that is a member of the S&P 500
index and has raised its dividend every year for at least 25 years.
These are primarily blue chip companies
with long histories of growing earnings and dividends.
If your investing goals are to impress
your friends at cocktail parties with your knowledge of brand-new technology
and to brag about the millions of dollars you will make off of the companies
behind those technologies—well, then, Dividend Aristocrats aren’t for you.
Most people don’t find a company like
Genuine Parts (NYSE: GPC), which makes auto replacement parts, to be terribly
exciting. I’m not even sure Genuine Parts’ CEO is all that excited about
replacement parts.
But the company makes a ton of money—$565
million in 2011—and it has increased its dividend every year since 1956. That
is pretty exciting.
Think about that for a minute: Every
year. Since 1956.
Through the Cuban Missile Crisis, the
Kennedy assassinations, Vietnam, Watergate, gas lines, the Cold War, the rise
of Japan, the rise of China, 9/11, the dot-com collapse, the housing bust, and
the Great Recession—through all of these difficult, and in some cases tragic,
events, when pundits were saying the sky was falling, at times when the economy
really did stink, Genuine Parts went about its business, making and selling
auto parts and returning more money to shareholders than it did the year
before.
The last time Genuine Parts did not
increase its dividend, President Eisenhower was in the White House and Elvis
Presley made his television debut on The Louisiana Hayride on KSLA-TV in
Shreveport, Louisiana.
That was a long time ago.
And that is pretty darn exciting.
The
Index
The Dividend Aristocrat Index is
currently made up of 51 companies and is rebalanced every year. If a company
raises its dividend for the twenty-fifth consecutive year, it is added to the
index the following December. If a company fails to raise its dividend, it is
removed.
In order to qualify to be an S&P
Dividend Aristocrat, a stock must meet these four criteria:
- Be
a member of the S&P 500 index
- Have
increased its dividend every year for at least 25 years in a row
- Have
a market capitalization of at least $3 billion on the day the index is
rebalanced
- Trade
a daily average of at least $5 million worth of stock for the six months prior
to the rebalancing date
In 2012, ten companies, including Nucor
(NYSE: NUE), were added to the index, while one company, CenturyLink (NYSE:
CTL), was dropped.
Each company is given equal weight in
the index. This means that the size of the company isn’t a factor in the
calculation of the performance of the index. A company with a $20 billion
market cap has the same impact on the index as a $40 billion company.
Some other variables can impact a
company’s ability to be placed in the index, such as sector diversification.
But these other considerations don’t come into play often. The most important
factors are 25 years of consecutive dividend increases and being a member of
the S&P 500.
The index is great for showing you all
kinds of performance statistics as to why Dividend Aristocrats make excellent
investments and how they outperform the S&P 500. But you can’t buy the
index. Surprisingly, there isn’t an exchange-traded fund (ETF) or mutual fund
that tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrat index.
ETF: A fund that is bought and sold
like a stock. It often tracks an index or sector and is passively
managed—meaning an investment manager is not actively making buying and selling
decisions based on the economy, market, or a company's prospects. Stocks in an
ETF are bought and sold based on their inclusion or weighting in an index or
sector.
There is, however, an ETF that is based
on the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats index. This index is made up of
the 60 highest-yielding members of the S&P Composite 1500 that have raised
their dividends for 25 years in a row.
This ETF is called the Standard &
Poor’s depositary receipt (SPDR) S&P Dividend ETF (Amex: SDY). It attempts
to track the performance of the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index.
And while it might be tempting to buy
the SPDR S&P Dividend ETF for convenience purposes, I do not recommend
buying or owning it for several reasons.
- You have no control over the sector weightings. For example,
as I write this, 24% of the portfolio is invested in utilities. That is not
particularly surprising, as utilities are often the highest- yielding stocks.
But you should have more control over your own portfolio and invest according
to the way you see fit.
- It lacks a track record. The SPDR Dividend ETF has been
around only since 2007. Aristocrats have at least a 25-year track record.
Achievers, which we’ll discuss later, have at least a ten-year track record.
The purpose of investing, according to the ideas laid out in this book, is to
put your money in stocks with a long history of rewarding shareholders by
increasing the dividend. As it turns out, the SPDR Dividend ETF lowered its
dividend in 2009.
- In many cases, we can find higher yields in individual
stocks rather than this ETF.
There are no mutual funds dedicated to
Dividend Aristocrats at this time.
The
Champions
Dividend Aristocrats represent the
bluest of the blue chips—big, solid companies with two and a half decades or
more track records of raising dividends.
However, with only 40 to 50 stocks
qualifying to be included in the index in a given year, we need to expand our
universe— especially because not every Aristocrat has a decent yield. Just
because a company has raised its dividend for 25 years in a row doesn’t mean it
has an attractive dividend yield.
The yield could have started very small
and grown at a minuscule pace. Or the stock could have gotten hot, running up
in price and decreasing the yield. For example, Aristocrat Sherwin-Williams
(NYSE: SHW) has raised its dividend for 33 consecutive years but still only
yields 1.5%.
Therefore, we need to look in other
places for companies with juicy yields that have a history of growing the
dividend.
Enter the Champions.
The DRiP Resource Center. These stocks are similar to the Aristocrats in that the companies have raised
their dividends for at least 25 consecutive years. However, they are not
required to be part of the S&P 500 and have no liquidity or other
restrictions. Just the 25-year track record with an annual dividend boost.
That’s the only qualification.
I love the name Champions because it
reminds me of my favorite sport, boxing, and that a person doesn’t need to be
six foot three and 240 pounds to be a successful professional athlete.
I’ve seen grown men who weigh 125
pounds walk into an arena and be given the same respect (or even more) by an
adoring crowd as if they were the heavyweight champion of the world.
Some of the small stocks on the
Champions list also prove you don’t have to be big to be successful, More than
a few have market caps of under $1 billion yet are still terrific income
investments.
For example, Tompkins Financial Corp.
(NYSE: TMP) is a Dividend Champion. Tompkins, a small bank based in Ithaca, New
York, has a market cap of just $451 million and trades an average of 25,000
shares per day. Compare that with an Aristocrat such Kimberly Clark (NYSE:
KMB), which has a market cap of $29 billion and trades 2.5 million shares a
day.
As we look at Table 2.1, the list of Champions includes—but is not limited
to—Dividend Aristocrats. Typically, the Champions list has more than twice the
number of stocks as the Aristocrats.
Dividend Aristocrats are always
Dividend Champions because they’ve raised their dividend for 25 years in a
row but a Dividend Champion might not be a Dividend Aristocrat if the stock is
not in the S&P 500.
Some of the stocks on the Champions
list offer benefits to individual investors that may not be attainable by
professional money managers.
Table 2.1 Perpetual Dividend
Raisers
Some Champions are rather small, so an
institutional investor, such as a mutual fund manager, would not be able to buy
stock without moving the price considerably. Additionally, the manager might
have a tough time selling the stock due to liquidity issues.
For example, if a mutual fund manager
wanted to own a few million shares of California Water Service Group (NYSE:
CWT), it would be tough to either accumulate or sell stock when the time comes,
considering that it trades fewer than 250,000 shares per day.
However, an individual investor who
wants to pick up several thousand shares or fewer would have no problem buying
or selling them in the marketplace. In this case, the individual investor has
more flexibility than the money manager with millions at his or her disposal.
The professional money manager can
invest only in stocks that are large enough to handle the influx of money and
must buy enough shares to make a difference to the fund’s performance. The
individual investor can buy or sell without impacting the stock or attracting
much notice. The ability to purchase stocks that are inaccessible to
professionals is one way individual shareholders can outperform institutional
money managers.
As you conduct your research on
Perpetual Dividend Raisers, you’ll find plenty of stocks that don’t trade much
volume but are great little companies with long histories of dividend
increases. You’ll be able to buy them, but the fund manager at Fidelity and
Vanguard will have to pass them up.
Junior
Aristocrats
There are usually only about 40 to 50
Dividend Aristocrats and about 100 Champions.
Although 100 stocks sounds like a lot,
keep in mind that, like the Aristocrats, not all of them have attractive
yields. Despite annual raises, many still have yields below 3%. So we need to
expand our choices even further.
The next groups of stocks are the
Dividend Achievers and Contenders.
Dividend Achievers are stocks that have
raised their dividends for ten or more consecutive years and meet very easy
liquidity requirements.
Moody’s Investor Services started the
list in 1979, and it is now maintained by Indxis.
Interestingly, although no ETFs track
the Dividend Aristocrats, several follow Dividend Achievers.
The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
(NYSE: VIG) tracks the Mergent Dividend Achievers Index. (Mergent is owned by
Indxis and maintains the index.)
The Powershares Dividend Achievers
(NYSE: PFM) tracks the Broad Dividend Achievers Index. An important difference
between the Dividend Achievers Index and the Broad Dividend Achievers Index is
that the Broad Index can include Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and
Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs). Those stocks often have higher yields.
We’ll discuss REITs and MLPs in Chapter 6.
The Powershares High Yield Equity
Dividend Achievers (NYSE: PEY) corresponds to the Mergent Dividend Achievers 50
Index. The Achievers 50 Index consists of the top 50 highest-yielding stocks in
the Broad Dividend Achievers Index that have raised their dividends for at
least ten straight years. These stocks also must trade a minimum of $500,000
worth of stock per day in the November and December prior to reconstituting the
index.
Just as Achievers are like junior
Aristocrats, Dividend Contenders are like junior Champions.
The Aristocrats and Achievers lists are
maintained by two institutional financial firms: Standard & Poor’s and
Indxis. Both lists are reconstituted once per year. The Champions and
Contenders list is maintained and dutifully updated every month by David Fish
of the DRiP Resource Center.
The only thing a company has to do to
qualify to be a Contender is raise its dividend every year for 10 to 24 years.
Similar to the Champions, there are no liquidity or index requirements.
And just as all Aristocrats are
Champions but not all Champions are Aristocrats, all Achievers are Contenders
but not all Contenders are Achievers.
Champions and Contenders have the same
time requirements as far as number of years of consecutive dividend raises as
Aristocrats and Achievers, but the Champions and Contenders have no other
restrictions.
Beneath the Contenders are the
Challengers. These are companies that have raised their dividends between five
and nine years in a row. Challengers are also part of the compilation tracked
by David Fish and the DRiP Resource Center. As you can see in Table 2.1
Champions and Contenders have the same requirements.
You might automatically think that you
should stick with Champions because of their long-term track record. After all,
with a 25-year (or more) history of boosting the dividend, the company is
probably more likely to continue to raise the dividend than one with just a
5-year record.
Typically, fewer than 10% of Champions
fail to raise the dividend in any given year, while roughly 15% of Contenders
and Challengers do not boost the dividend.
However, it’s important to understand
that because Champions are either more mature or have more mature dividend
programs, their yields and dividend growth rates are often lower than those of
Contenders.
For example, as of the end of 2011, the
average yield for a Champion was 2.94% versus 3.1% for a Contender and 3.36%
for a Challenger. The most recent average dividend increases were 7.24%, 8.47%,
and 10.99% respectively. The current growth rates are lower than their average
ten-year growth rates as companies are undoubtedly still smarting from the
recession. (See Table 2.2.)
The difference seems small but gets
magnified as the years go on.
As you can see from Table 2.2, if you invest in the average
Champion, and each year the dividend grows by the same amount as in 2011, after
ten years your dividend yield would be 5.5%.
Table 2.2 Champions, Contenders, and Challengers
|
Average Yield
|
Average
Most Recent Dividend Increase
|
Yield in
10 Years*
|
Income
Received over
10 Years
($10K invested)*
|
Champions
|
2.94%
|
7.24%
|
5.5%
|
$4,108
|
Contenders
|
3.1%
|
8.47
|
6.4%
|
$4,592
|
Challengers
|
3.36%
|
10.99%
|
8.6%
|
$5,615
|
In the case of the Contender, your
yield would increase to 6.4%. If your original investment was $10,000, based on
the given assumptions, in ten years you’d collect $4,592 in income with the
Contender and $4,108 from the Champion.
The Challengers, with their much higher
dividend growth rates, blow away their more mature peers. After ten years, the
dividend yield surges to 8.6%, and the investor would have collected $5,615 in
income.
As with most investments on Wall
Street, the seemingly safer investment typically offers a lower yield and
growth prospects—in this particular situation, I’m talking about dividend
growth, but often, share price growth is less for safer companies than those
with more risk.
Investors have to weigh their need for
safety against their need for income or growth. A Dividend Contender/Achiever
can still be a relatively safe stock. A company like Atmos Energy (NYSE: ATO),
a Dallas-based natural gas distribution and transportation company, has boosted
its dividend every year for 23 years. Since 1988, the stock has risen at a
compound annual growth rate of 5.4% (not including dividends).
In the Challenger category, a company
such as Columbia Sportswear (Nasdaq: COLM) has raised its dividend every year
for six years. During that time, the stock has risen 68%, or a compound annual
growth rate of 9% per year.
Challengers, being earlier into their
dividend-raising histories, tend to lift their dividends at a faster pace than
Champions and Contenders. (See Table
2.3.)
Table 2.3 Annual Dividend Growth Rates as of December 2011
|
1 Year
|
3 Year
|
5 Year
|
10 Year
|
Champions
|
7.1%
|
6.0%
|
7.6%
|
7.6%
|
Contenders
|
7.8%
|
6.8%
|
9.0%
|
10.3%
|
Challengers
|
12.1%
|
10.8%
|
16.0%
|
14.3%
|
Survivorship
From the statistics just cited, you
might automatically think that investing in the Challengers is the better way
to go. After all, they offer a higher yield and higher dividend growth rate.
Besides, for the most recent dividend increases, their one-, three-, five-, and
ten-year dividend growth rates are higher as well.
However, you need to take into account
survivorship—the fact that the companies we are examining are the ones that did
not get dropped from the list of Challengers. In other words, there are some
companies that you may have invested in years ago, expecting a never-ending
increase in the dividend, that were cut because they failed to raise the dividend.
For example, up until February 2009,
financial services firm F.N.B. Corp. (NYSE: FNB) had a 35-year history of
raising its dividend. In the ten years prior, the company grew its dividend by
an average of 7.8% per year.
However, in August 2008, after 35
straight years of dividend boosts, the company kept its $0.24 quarterly
dividend the same as it was in the previous year and in February 2009 cut the
dividend in half, where it remains today.
So F.N.B is no longer calculated in any
growth rate or total return figures pertaining to Dividend Champions.
Later in the book, I’ll show you that
the odds are in your favor that your company will continue to raise the
dividend each and every year especially after you learn what to look for in a
stock to ensure the safety of the dividend.
SUMMARY
- Dividend Aristocrats are members of the S&P 500 that
have raised their dividends every year for at least 25 years.
- Dividend Champions are any stocks that have raised their
dividends for 25 consecutive years.
- Junior Aristocrats include companies that have raised their
dividends between 5 and 24 years in a row.
- You’re better off buying individual stocks rather than
dividend ETFs or funds.
- Genuine Parts’ CEO falls asleep at his desk because his
business is so boring. (Okay, he probably doesn’t. But no one would blame him
if he did.)